Choices of implant manufacturers
The Different Manufacturers of Breast Implants: What You Need to Know
Choosing a breast implant isn’t only about size and shape. The manufacturer matters for safety, feel, longevity and long-term outcomes. Below is a patient-friendly comparison of the brands I most often discuss in clinic—GCA, Mentor and Motiva—plus answers to common questions.
What breast implants are made of
- The shell (envelope): the outer layer that contains the filler.
- The filler: usually a cohesive silicone gel that’s elastic and designed to stay in place even if the shell is damaged.
GCA (GC Aesthetics) Implants
Why I often use them: excellent balance of safety, softness and long-term performance.
Key advantages
- Modern shell technology designed for durability.
- Cohesive silicone gel that stays together rather than freely leaking.
- Very low capsular contracture rates in my practice experience.
- Micro-texture (~4–5 μm) aims for the “sweet spot” between smooth and rough to reduce complications, with a theoretical near-zero ALCL risk.
Bottom line: soft, natural feel with a strong safety profile.
Mentor Implants
Well-established US brand with a decades-long track record.
Key points
- Long history & FDA-approved: used in millions of women worldwide.
- Conservative evolution: designs have changed little over 20+ years—reassuring to some, less innovative to others.
- Texture: typically rougher (~25 μm) than micro-textured options.
Bottom line: proven reliability with less emphasis on newer shell/gel innovations.
Motiva Implants
Innovation-focused brand known for soft feel and modern shell design.
Key points
- Advanced shell & gel for a notably soft feel.
- Past RFID chip feature helped identify the exact implant model; now discontinued due to MRI compatibility concerns.
- Price: often higher—benefits vs. cost should be weighed.
Bottom line: modern design and softness at a premium price, without clear outcome superiority for most patients.
Surface types: smooth, textured and the “micro-texture” middle ground
- Smooth: very low ALCL association, slightly higher capsular contracture risk.
- Highly textured: historically used to reduce contracture; associated with higher ALCL risk.
- Micro-textured (e.g., GCA, Motiva): aims to minimise both risks with a subtle surface (≈4–5 μm).
Choosing the right implant for you
- Your cosmetic goals (natural vs. fuller/rounder upper-pole, cleavage emphasis).
- Your body measurements and breast footprint.
- Lifestyle (e.g., strong pectorals, sport).
- Budget and your surgeon’s brand experience.
In many cases I favour GCA for their balance of softness, low complication rates and modern shell technology. The final choice is always shared between you and your surgeon after careful measurements and discussion.